Here are some technical notes about the Valvula Films Demo 2014.

Film-Alexa-Epic test shot by Daniel HenrĂ­quez Ilic Valvula Films

As usual there are links to graded DPX & TIFF files at maximum resolution, just right click on the image you want more detail from...

All the RAW files are available in zip form - Film - Alexa - Epic - F65

Also a link to the 2.2GB mov version of the tests here


The shooting

It was shot at Valvula Films office in Santiago in mid January. We wanted to compare 35mm color negative (Vision3 200T 5213 and Vision3 250D 5207) and three digital cameras (Arri Alexa XT, Sony F65 and Red Epic-X MX) shooting RAW. At the time of the shooting there was no Red Dragon available in town The 35mm footage (400 feet in total) was developed at Cinecolor Lab (normal ECN-2 processing) in Santiago and then scanned at 2K RGB 10bit log at Cinelicious in Los Angeles. Our key collaborators for this test were :

- CongoFilms camera rental company (this company provided the Arri 435 ES film camera and Arri Alexa XT)

- Cine Sur camera rental company (this company provided the Sony F65)

- Cinelicious (this company provided the 2K RGB 10 bit log scanning of the 35mm footage via their DFT Scanity).

The first shot :

It was shot under tungsten lighting. Film stock was 200T (5213) and the digital cameras were set at 3200 K.

Objective : To compare the response of the flesh tones and gray scale under controlled light. We also used this shot to change the lens's focus distance whilst doing a pan from the actress to a focus chart in the background, and then back to the actress.

The Century Optics chart -in this test- was not used as a resolution chart, just as a focus chart

The second shot :

It was shot under daylight lighting. Film stock was 250D (5207) and the digital cameras were set at 5500 K or 5600 K.

Objective : To compare the exposure latitude / dynamic range, considering a set-up that includes interior and exterior.

Note : as the scanning of the Vision3 35mm footage was done at 10 bit log, the original camera negative is likely to have more information in the highlights - that could be recovered via a 16bit scanning.

The third shot :

It was shot under daylight lighting. Film stock was 250D (5207) and the digital cameras were set at 5500 K or 5600 K.

Objective : To compare hand-held camera shooting and also under/over-exposure. This is a sequence shot with only one F Stop (for each camera shot) through all the shot and with only one overall color primary grade (for each sequence shot), no color dissolves were used.

The correct exposure is for the X-Rite Colorchecker in the garden.

Note : The Red Epic had the worst ergonomics for hand-held shooting whilst the Arri 435 had the best ergonomics.

Post-Production notes :

Debayering and Color grading via da Vinci Resolve 11. (The demosaic settings are reported on the Demo itself)

The color grading was rendered as TIFF RGB 16bits at native resolution.

For each take, the colorist Luis Quevedo only used one node, and only performed primary color grading (plus overall saturation) with no color grading dissolves.

The rendered files were ingested and edited as 1920x1080 pixels on a Quantel Pablo Rio station and finalized as 1920x1080 pixels TIFF RGB 16 bits.

Concerning scaling and aspect ratio

- the film scans (2048x1556) were scaled to 1920x1080 pixels cropping top and bottom, so the 1.316:1 aspect ratio of the image became 16/9

- the media from the Alexa (2880x1620) is already 16/9 and was just scaled down to 1920x1080 pixels

- whilst the Sony F65 and the Red Epic footage were scaled down to 1920x1080 pixels and preserved their original aspect ratio as we used a letter-box.

5213 35mm film scan

ARRI XT

RED Epic-X

Sony F65

 

 










If you find any mistakes or errors of any kind please let admin know, we'd like to fix them!

Copyright 1996-2015 CML-Cinematography Mailing List