Cinematography Mailing List

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

Recent CML Tests

Canon C300 initial latitude tests

Epic exposed +/- 7 stops

With & Without HDR

Alexa +/- 7 stops

Infra Red exposure & Filter tests

Skintone tests

Alexa-Canon 7D-Panasonic 3700

Red-MX-SI2K

 

 

 

Anamorphic Lenses & Super 35 . . .Updated...

Published : 4th June 2004


I've been reading a few old posts regarding Anamorphic shooting Vs Super 35 framed for 2.4:1. Never having shot anamorphic, what I'm wondering is :

If spherical lenses can, with a few exceptions, cover the full aperture of 35mm (hence super 35), can anamorphic lenses also cover full aperture, or will they only cover academy aperture?

Apologies once again if the answer is obvious...!

Stuart Brereton
DP, UK
www.46and2films.com



I wouldn't be surprised if most anamorphic lenses cover 4-perf 35mm Full Aperture (since they have to cover it vertically anyway) but since they have a 2X squeeze and Full Aperture is 1.33 : 1, that would be a 2.66 : 1 aspect ratio when un-squeezed.

CinemaScope was originally designed to be a Full Aperture format until the decision was made during the production of "The Robe" to put the soundtrack on the print. In this case, mag striping was used on each side of the frame and Kodak made the print stock with smaller perfs (CS perfs) to give the soundtrack a little more room. The mag soundtrack stripes reduced the effective aspect ratio to 2.55 : 1. So early CinemaScope movies were all shot optically centred for Full Aperture.

Just like with a spherical Super-35 production, you'd have to double-check to see if all your anamorphic lenses covered Full Aperture if for some reason, you wanted a 2.66 : 1 image. I'm just not sure why since that's not a projection format.

David Mullen ASC
Cinematographer / L.A.



David Mullen wrote :

>Just like with a spherical Super-35 production, you'd have to double->check to see if all your anamorphic lenses covered Full Aperture if for >some reason, you wanted a 2.66 : 1 image. I'm just not sure why since >that's not a projection format.

Many thanks for the info, David. It was more of a 'I wonder' kind of question than something relating to a shoot.

Thanks again,

Stuart Brereton
DP, UK


Added from the previous posts...

I've been reading a few old posts regarding Anamorphic shooting Vs Super 35 framed for 2.4:1.

As I have never have shot anamorphic, what I'm wondering is :

If spherical lenses can, with a few exceptions, cover the full aperture of 35mm (hence super 35), can anamorphic lenses also cover full aperture, or will they only cover academy aperture?

Stuart Brereton
DP, UK
www.46and2films.com



I wouldn't be surprised if most anamorphic lenses cover 4-perf 35mm Full Aperture (since they have to cover it vertically anyway) but since they have a 2X squeeze and Full Aperture is 1.33 : 1, that would be a 2.66 : 1 aspect ratio when un-squeezed.

CinemaScope was originally designed to be a Full Aperture format until the decision was made during the production of "The Robe" to put the soundtrack on the print. In this case, mag striping was used on each side of the frame and Kodak made the print stock with smaller perfs (CS perfs) to give the soundtrack a little more room. The mag soundtrack stripes reduced the effective aspect ratio to 2.55 : 1.

So early CinemaScope movies were all shot optically centred for Full Aperture.

Just like with a spherical Super-35 production, you'd have to double - check to see if all your anamorphic lenses covered Full Aperture if for some reason, you wanted a 2.66 : 1 image. I'm just not sure why since that's not a projection format.

David Mullen ASC
Cinematographer / L.A.



David Mullen ASC wrote :

>Just like with a spherical Super-35 production, you'd have to double->check to see if all your anamorphic lenses covered Full Aperture if for >some reason, you wanted a 2.66 : 1 image. I'm just not sure why since >that's not a projection format.

Many thanks for the info, David. It was more of a 'I wonder' kind of question than something relating to a shoot.

Thanks again,

Stuart Brereton
DP, UK


 

 

Recent Discussions

Brilliant Lens Data Chart!

Best Use of a GoPro

C300

Shooting Frozen Film

F65 Q&A

OLED Flicker

Advances in Volumetric Imaging

Hugo - Shakespeare was wrong

Red is suing Arri

200 orders for F65

Alexa Ghosting

RED MX black levels

Uncoated Lenses

Best ND Filters

New handheld support grips

The perfect LED light test

Rec 709 for theatrical release

Optical Physics

Why I charge more

Big Sony 3D ad

Epic at 300fps?

8 bit values for Log

90's diffusion filters

Big soft daylight source

Photometric App

Grading monitor calibration tool?

My poor feet

Stereoscopic VFX

Green spike on KinoFlo

 

Images & Text Copyright © CML do not use without permission